Training & Compliance

DOL Cracks Down on Independent Contractor Classification

A recent effort by the Department of Labor (DOL) to revisit how employees versus independent contractors are classified makes it clear that they mean business. Perhaps the most startling feature of their new effort involves how the DOL will likely consider all workers to be employees rather than independent contractors. Only those who fit strict criteria will be classified as independent contractors. Today, BLR’s Tammy Binford gives us the details.

BLR’s Legal Editor Tammy Binford explores a new interpretation of language in the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). This interpretation is the latest effort in the government’s fight against what it sees as troubling misclassification of employees as independent contractors.

On July 15, David Weil, administrator of the DOL Wage and Hour Division (WHD), released Administrator’s Interpretation 2015-1 to analyze how the FLSA determines whether an individual should be classified as an employee or as an independent contractor.

Employers are able to avoid certain taxes and benefits costs when they use independent contractors. Therefore, the DOL has long battled what it sees as a proliferation of workers misclassified as independent contractors when they instead fit the law’s definition of “employee.” The tests used to determine employee or independent contractor status aren’t always clear-cut, however, and the new guidance is seen as further restricting who fits the definition of “independent contractor.”

The new effort by the DOL “places new emphasis on what appears to be a concerted effort . . . to eventually supplant the economic realities test with an even more restrictive economic independence test in order to restrict reliance on independent contractor status even further,” said Robert Tinnin, editor of New Mexico Employment Law Letter and an attorney with the Tinnin Law Firm in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Tinnin pointed to the first sentence of the interpretation document’s conclusion: “In sum, most workers are employees under the FLSA’s broad definitions.”

That language “signals clearly that the DOL will virtually presume workers are employees as opposed to independent contractors,” Tinnin said. “This expanded emphasis on the ‘economic independence’ factor is tantamount to the adoption of a new, even more restrictive standard.”

Tinnin said he warns employers that want to classify workers as independent contractors to “carefully and critically examine the requirements of a job before opting for independent contractor status.” The new guidance “reinforces the validity of a strategy of caution in classifying workers as independent contractors,” he said.


Recruiting is a challenge for 2015. Learn what’s happening in the real world with our new research report, Recruiting Best Practices: Finding and Attracting Talent in 2015’s Challenging Business Climate. Learn More.


Albert L. Vreeland, the editor of Alabama Employment Law Letter and an attorney with Lehr Middlebrooks Vreeland & Thompson, P.C. in Birmingham, Alabama, said the new administrator’s interpretation doesn’t change the DOL’s view on who is an independent contractor and who is an employee. Instead, “it merely restates the position they have taken before,” he said.

“It does, however, draw more attention to the issue and may encourage some independent contractors and their attorneys to challenge the classification,” Vreeland said.

The new interpretation explains that to determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor under the FLSA, “courts use the multifactorial ‘economic realities’ test, which focuses on whether the worker is economically dependent on the employer or in business for him or herself.”

The guidance states that a worker who is economically dependent on an employer “is suffered or permitted to work” by the employer. “Thus, applying the economic realities test in view of the expansive definition of ‘employ’ under the Act, most workers are employees under the FLSA. The application of the economic realities factors must be consistent with the broad ‘suffer or permit to work’ standard of the FLSA,” the document states.

In addition to the administrator interpretation, Weil posted an entry on the DOL blog in which he said misclassified employees are often denied access to benefits and protections they should be entitled to. He also said misclassification means losses to the federal and state governments in the form of lower tax revenues, as well as less revenue to state unemployment insurance and workers’ compensation funds.

“In recent years, employers have increasingly contracted out or otherwise shed activities to be performed by other entities through, for example, the use of subcontractors, temporary agencies, labor brokers, franchising, licensing, and third-party management,” Weil wrote on the blog. “Among the many consequences of these ‘fissured workplaces,’ misclassifying employees as independent contractors is among the most damaging to workers and our economy.”

Weil’s blog post uses terminology from the title of a book he wrote, The Fissured Workplace: Why Work Became So Bad for So Many and What Can Be Done to Improve It, before making his DOL post.

Classifying employees correctly is just one best practice an HR manager should try to follow. Getting recruiting right is another.

Curious to know more about what else is going on with recruiting in the real world? We can help. Six times a year, the HR Daily Advisor Research Team conducts detailed research into contemporary HR challenges to highlight best practices and common policies and procedures. The topic for this report is one of the most pressing for human resources—recruiting.

Recruiting is changing at a rapid pace. Some organizations are abandoning traditional methods for social media; some think software can do a better job than people. See the results of our national survey as well as demographic breakdowns for each question.

Available in both print and downloadable PDF versions.


Recruiting strategies? Onboarding practices? What’s working in retention? It’s all in this report: Recruiting Best Practices: Finding and Attracting Talent in 2015’s Challenging Business Climate. Click Here.


Among the features of this new product:

  • Results from our national survey on recruiting best practices
  • Further results of a supplemental survey on recruitment metrics and costs
  • National data from the main survey broken down by key demographics
  • Summaries and highlights
  • And much more!

Don’t be left in the dark! With the information in this report, you will get a feel for what’s working out there—and maybe learn a little about what your competitors might be up to.

Download Now or Order the Print Version